Access darkscope.com. Home - Darkscope International Ltd.

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.6 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value460 ms

62/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.1 s

12/100

10%

darkscope.com

199 ms

darkscope.com

3937 ms

js

60 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

192 ms

post-102.css

296 ms

Our browser made a total of 135 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (123 requests) were addressed to the original Darkscope.com, 7% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Darkscope.com.

Content Size

5.0 MB

After Optimization

4.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Darkscope.com main page is 5.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 167.5 kB

Original 196.4 kB
After minification 189.0 kB
After compression 28.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 167.5 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 781.3 kB

Original 4.2 MB
After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Darkscope needs image optimization as it can save up to 781.3 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

Original 408.5 kB
After minification 408.4 kB
After compression 395.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

Original 208.7 kB
After minification 208.1 kB
After compression 195.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Darkscope.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

122

After Optimization

The browser has sent 122 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Darkscope. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 54 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 47 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.