Access datalabel.com. Continental Datalabel

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

10/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,350 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.4 s

0/100

10%

datalabel.com

60 ms

datalabel.com

131 ms

style.min.css

51 ms

wc-memberships-blocks.min.css

75 ms

general.css

70 ms

Our browser made a total of 118 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (103 requests) were addressed to the original Datalabel.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.datatables.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (457 ms) relates to the external source Chimpstatic.com.

Content Size

6.6 MB

After Optimization

6.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Datalabel.com main page is 6.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 139.0 kB

Original 168.5 kB
After minification 164.6 kB
After compression 29.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

Original 5.9 MB
After minification 5.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Datalabel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.8 kB

Original 275.8 kB
After minification 275.2 kB
After compression 265.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 10.2 kB

Original 296.1 kB
After minification 295.8 kB
After compression 285.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datalabel.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

112

After Optimization

The browser has sent 112 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Datalabel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 89 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.