Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

datedial.com

A variety of calculators - Date and Time Calculators; Numerical Problems Calculators; Weights and Lengths Calculators; Financial Calculators

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

675 ms

Page Rendered

253 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Date Dial content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about datedial.com

Maths problems solutions, date and time utilities to identify days, months, quarters, years, hours, minutes, and seconds of past and future dates and times; dates and times differences;convert weights...

Visit datedial.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Datedial.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 928 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

datedial.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

86/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,310 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.9 s

34/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

datedial.com

105 ms

DateDial.css

27 ms

adsbygoogle.js

107 ms

jsapi

22 ms

t13n

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Datedial.com, 33% (5 requests) were made to Google.com and 20% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (377 ms) relates to the external source Pagead2.googlesyndication.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 364.4 kB (52%)

Content Size

706.6 kB

After Optimization

342.1 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Datedial.com main page is 706.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 669.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 29.8 kB

  • Original 36.3 kB
  • After minification 35.8 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 334.4 kB

  • Original 669.4 kB
  • After minification 669.4 kB
  • After compression 335.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 334.4 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 266 B

  • Original 873 B
  • After minification 873 B
  • After compression 607 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Datedial.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 266 B or 30% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (40%)

Requests Now

10

After Optimization

6

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Date Dial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

datedial.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

datedial.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

datedial.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Datedial.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Datedial.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Date Dial. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: