Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 70

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

dategroup.net

Cast Iron Foundry in India|SG Iron Foundry in India|Ductile Iron Foundry|Ved Industries : Date Group

Page Load Speed

7.1 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

705 ms

About Website

Welcome to dategroup.net homepage info - get ready to check Date Group best content right away, or after learning these important things about dategroup.net

Ved Industries is a leading Cast Iron Foundry & SG Iron Foundry in India. We are IATF 16949 : 2016 Certified and ISO 9001 : 2015 certified foundry. We manufacture fully finished casting components wei...

Visit dategroup.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Dategroup.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dategroup.net performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.3 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.141

78/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dategroup.net

1227 ms

js

67 ms

css

34 ms

bootstrap.min.css

1010 ms

owl.carousel.css

415 ms

Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (91 requests) were addressed to the original Dategroup.net, 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Transparenttextures.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Dategroup.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (22%)

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

4.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Dategroup.net main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 52.7 kB
  • After minification 38.3 kB
  • After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 14.4 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 182.6 kB

  • Original 4.3 MB
  • After minification 4.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Date Group images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 576.6 kB

  • Original 785.8 kB
  • After minification 701.0 kB
  • After compression 209.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 576.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 477.0 kB

  • Original 555.9 kB
  • After minification 461.5 kB
  • After compression 79.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dategroup.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 477.0 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (40%)

Requests Now

92

After Optimization

55

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Date Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

dategroup.net accessibility score

70

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

dategroup.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

dategroup.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dategroup.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Dategroup.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Date Group. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: