Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

davicon.com

Home - Davicon

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

557 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Davicon content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about davicon.com

from the ground up

Visit davicon.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Davicon.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

davicon.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value930 ms

30/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

davicon.com

181 ms

davicon.com

319 ms

www.davicon.com

407 ms

script.js

158 ms

style.min.css

309 ms

Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Davicon.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (704 ms) belongs to the original domain Davicon.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 129.3 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.4 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Davicon.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 124.9 kB

  • Original 148.2 kB
  • After minification 145.9 kB
  • After compression 23.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 124.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 870 B

  • Original 2.8 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Davicon images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 270.4 kB
  • After minification 270.4 kB
  • After compression 267.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 550 B

  • Original 180.0 kB
  • After minification 180.0 kB
  • After compression 179.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Davicon.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (64%)

Requests Now

75

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Davicon. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

davicon.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

davicon.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

davicon.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Davicon.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Davicon.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Davicon. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: