Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

deskjock.reviews

Deskjock reviews - Service | Product | Manage | Share | Claim Business

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

267 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

111 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Deskjock content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about deskjock.reviews

Deskjock is one of the UK's favourite consumer review sites packed full of exciting features and special offers. Achieve genuine feedback with Deskjock Review management system free to use from day on...

Visit deskjock.reviews

Key Findings

We analyzed Deskjock.reviews page load time and found that the first response time was 267 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

deskjock.reviews performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,890 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

4/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

deskjock.reviews

267 ms

deskjock.reviews

392 ms

bebasneue.css

87 ms

pricebox.css

172 ms

bootstrap.min.css

513 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Deskjock.reviews, 9% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (981 ms) belongs to the original domain Deskjock.reviews.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 531.3 kB (58%)

Content Size

912.6 kB

After Optimization

381.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Deskjock.reviews main page is 912.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 439.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 69.2 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 64.9 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 15.5 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 31.7 kB

  • Original 35.8 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Deskjock needs image optimization as it can save up to 31.7 kB or 89% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 180.6 kB

  • Original 439.1 kB
  • After minification 426.9 kB
  • After compression 258.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 180.6 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 249.9 kB

  • Original 357.3 kB
  • After minification 320.5 kB
  • After compression 107.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Deskjock.reviews needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 249.9 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (70%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

15

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Deskjock. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

deskjock.reviews accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

deskjock.reviews best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

deskjock.reviews SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Deskjock.reviews can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Deskjock.reviews main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Deskjock. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: