Report Summary

  • 72

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    82% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 66% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

dicorp.com

DICORP, Inc. | Technology that has Powered Trauma Registry Software & Beyond

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

13 ms

Resources Loaded

1.3 sec

Page Rendered

312 ms

About Website

Visit dicorp.com now to see the best up-to-date DICORP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dicorp.com

A technology company which develops low-code tools to power solutions for Trauma Registry Software and beyond.

Visit dicorp.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Dicorp.com page load time and found that the first response time was 13 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dicorp.com performance score

72

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value200 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dicorp.com

13 ms

www.dicorp.com

302 ms

styles.09270a34229c4b57e142.css

144 ms

runtime-es5.a4dadbc03350107420a4.js

97 ms

polyfills-es5.973f5ef135ff18710502.js

674 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Dicorp.com, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (674 ms) belongs to the original domain Dicorp.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 376.9 kB (48%)

Content Size

789.9 kB

After Optimization

413.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Dicorp.com main page is 789.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 458.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by -8 B

  • Original 0 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This web page is already compressed.

Image Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 313.5 kB

  • Original 458.9 kB
  • After minification 145.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, DICORP needs image optimization as it can save up to 313.5 kB or 68% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 60.4 kB

  • Original 318.8 kB
  • After minification 318.8 kB
  • After compression 258.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 19% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 3.0 kB

  • Original 12.2 kB
  • After minification 12.2 kB
  • After compression 9.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dicorp.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 3.0 kB or 25% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

17

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of DICORP. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

dicorp.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

dicorp.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

dicorp.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dicorp.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dicorp.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of DICORP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: