Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

diettastic.com

Diettastic.com

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

658 ms

Resources Loaded

736 ms

Page Rendered

0 ms

About Website

Visit diettastic.com now to see the best up-to-date Diettastic content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about diettastic.com

Visit diettastic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Diettastic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 658 ms and then it took 736 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

diettastic.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.7 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.3 s

61/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

diettastic.com

658 ms

px.js

44 ms

px.js

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 3 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Diettastic.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (658 ms) belongs to the original domain Diettastic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 kB (43%)

Content Size

2.5 kB

After Optimization

1.4 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Diettastic.com main page is 2.5 kB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 852 B

  • Original 1.8 kB
  • After minification 1.8 kB
  • After compression 971 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 852 B or 47% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 240 B

  • Original 692 B
  • After minification 692 B
  • After compression 452 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240 B or 35% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Diettastic. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

diettastic.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

diettastic.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

diettastic.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Diettastic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Diettastic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Diettastic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: