Access digitalmuscle.com. DigitalMuscle.com | Digital Muscle

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value770 ms

38/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

digitalmuscle.com

186 ms

www.digitalmuscle.com

381 ms

easy-author-image.css

23 ms

style.min.css

39 ms

theme.min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Digitalmuscle.com, 17% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.1 sec) relates to the external source Via.placeholder.com.

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Digitalmuscle.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 264.5 kB

Original 293.8 kB
After minification 285.0 kB
After compression 29.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 264.5 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 125.5 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Digital Muscle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 180 B

Original 138.3 kB
After minification 138.3 kB
After compression 138.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 461 B

Original 145.8 kB
After minification 145.8 kB
After compression 145.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Digitalmuscle.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Digital Muscle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.