Access divinginweb.com. Diving in web Agence de communication digitale: Site web, CM, SEO, SEA

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

41/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.101

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

27/100

10%

divinginweb.com

565 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

159 ms

style.css

258 ms

social-icons.css

170 ms

style.css

167 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Divinginweb.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (697 ms) belongs to the original domain Divinginweb.com.

Content Size

1.0 MB

After Optimization

752.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Divinginweb.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 685.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 26.0 kB

Original 34.2 kB
After minification 32.2 kB
After compression 8.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 26.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 21.4 kB

Original 685.2 kB
After minification 663.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Diving In Web images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 165.0 kB

Original 234.2 kB
After minification 205.9 kB
After compression 69.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 165.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 58.5 kB

Original 70.1 kB
After minification 57.0 kB
After compression 11.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Divinginweb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.5 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Diving In Web. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.