Access doublevisioneditorial.com. Welcome to Double Vision Editorial - Double Vision Editorial Double Vision Editorial One pair of eye...

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

65/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

85/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

76/100

10%

doublevisioneditorial.com

146 ms

doublevisioneditorial.com

2068 ms

js

99 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

72 ms

style.min.css

124 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Doublevisioneditorial.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Doublevisioneditorial.com.

Content Size

930.3 kB

After Optimization

750.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Doublevisioneditorial.com main page is 930.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 617.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 92.1 kB

Original 111.0 kB
After minification 107.1 kB
After compression 18.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

Original 617.9 kB
After minification 595.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Double Vision Editorial images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-43%

Potential reduce by 61.1 kB

Original 143.1 kB
After minification 143.1 kB
After compression 82.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 61.1 kB or 43% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

Original 58.3 kB
After minification 58.3 kB
After compression 53.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Doublevisioneditorial.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 47 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Double Vision Editorial. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.