Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

dream.press

Managed WordPress Hosting - Fast & Secure - DreamHost

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

814 ms

Page Rendered

953 ms

About Website

Visit dream.press now to see the best up-to-date Dream content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about dream.press

Fast, secure Managed WordPress hosting with free WordPress migrations and JetPack Professional. Guaranteed uptime and 24/7 support. Do more with DreamPress!

Visit dream.press

Key Findings

We analyzed Dream.press page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

dream.press performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.3 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,080 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value28.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

dream.press

163 ms

35 ms

vwo-script.js

11 ms

7d998cc9b7.js

53 ms

webpack-runtime-2ed6fc7374ac3984e803.js

16 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Dream.press, 40% (10 requests) were made to Dreamhost.com and 20% (5 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (163 ms) belongs to the original domain Dream.press.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 959.6 kB (57%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

712.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Dream.press main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 737.5 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 268.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 737.5 kB or 73% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 222.1 kB

  • Original 606.6 kB
  • After minification 606.6 kB
  • After compression 384.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 222.1 kB or 37% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 59.8 kB
  • After minification 59.8 kB
  • After compression 59.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dream.press has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (62%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

8

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

dream.press accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

dream.press best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

dream.press SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Dream.press can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Dream.press main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Dream. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: