Access dropdrop.global. Multi-Channel Brand Building and Adoption Consultancy

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value12.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,120 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.019

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

dropdrop.global

1242 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

88 ms

layerslider.css

173 ms

style.min.css

253 ms

styles.css

259 ms

Our browser made a total of 139 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (121 requests) were addressed to the original Dropdrop.global, 9% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) belongs to the original domain Dropdrop.global.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Dropdrop.global main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 826.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 139.8 kB

Original 164.4 kB
After minification 159.6 kB
After compression 24.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 139.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 93.8 kB

Original 680.9 kB
After minification 587.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dropdrop needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.8 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 135.8 kB

Original 826.9 kB
After minification 826.9 kB
After compression 691.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 135.8 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

Original 187.1 kB
After minification 187.1 kB
After compression 133.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dropdrop.global needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 53.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Now

124

After Optimization

The browser has sent 124 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dropdrop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.