Access dryyard.com. Drainage & Waterproofing Solutions

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

24/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,880 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.575

12/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.7 s

1/100

10%

dryyard.com

106 ms

dryyard.com

30 ms

js

52 ms

style.min.css

193 ms

front-flex.min.css

131 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (46 requests) were addressed to the original Dryyard.com, 10% (7 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 10% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (574 ms) belongs to the original domain Dryyard.com.

Content Size

5.6 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Dryyard.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 60.3 kB

Original 79.0 kB
After minification 77.6 kB
After compression 18.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.3 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 234.9 kB

Original 4.9 MB
After minification 4.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Dryyard images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 63.8 kB

Original 374.8 kB
After minification 374.5 kB
After compression 311.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 43.0 kB

Original 191.1 kB
After minification 190.8 kB
After compression 148.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dryyard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dryyard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.