Access dunwoodypreservationtrust.org. Dunwoody History & Heritage

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.5 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.3 s

9/100

10%

dunwoodypreservationtrust.org

58 ms

dunwoodypreservationtrust.org

1393 ms

nectar-slider.css

29 ms

portfolio.css

58 ms

grid-system.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 80% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Dunwoodypreservationtrust.org, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Dunwoodypreservationtrust.org.

Content Size

4.8 MB

After Optimization

3.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Dunwoodypreservationtrust.org main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 77.3 kB

Original 92.7 kB
After minification 88.8 kB
After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 743.2 kB

Original 3.8 MB
After minification 3.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Dunwoody Preservation Trust needs image optimization as it can save up to 743.2 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 106.9 kB

Original 639.8 kB
After minification 639.8 kB
After compression 532.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 106.9 kB or 17% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 56.0 kB

Original 179.2 kB
After minification 179.2 kB
After compression 123.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Dunwoodypreservationtrust.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 56.0 kB or 31% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Dunwoody Preservation Trust. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.