Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

ru.distance.to

Калькулятор расстояний — считайте расстояния онлайн!

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

133 ms

Resources Loaded

755 ms

Page Rendered

293 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ru Distance content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ru.distance.to

Популярный калькулятор расстояний считает расстояния в километрах между любыми местами и координатами, предлагает маршруты, интерактивные карты и информацию.

Visit ru.distance.to

Key Findings

We analyzed Ru.distance.to page load time and found that the first response time was 133 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ru.distance.to performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

85/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.115

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.4 s

39/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ru.distance.to

133 ms

ru.distance.to

434 ms

leaflet.css

40 ms

maplibre-gl.css

53 ms

style-min.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 16% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Ru.distance.to, 68% (21 requests) were made to Distance.to and 6% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) belongs to the original domain Ru.distance.to.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 41.7 kB (10%)

Content Size

430.5 kB

After Optimization

388.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ru.distance.to main page is 430.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 375.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 36.5 kB

  • Original 45.4 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.8 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

  • Original 375.5 kB
  • After minification 370.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ru Distance images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 4.5 kB
  • After minification 4.5 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 97 B

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ru.distance.to has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (64%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ru Distance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

ru.distance.to accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

[lang] attributes do not have a valid value

Best Practices

ru.distance.to best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ru.distance.to SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ru.distance.to can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ru.distance.to main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ru Distance. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: