Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

echterhage.de

Echterhage Holding, Neuenrade - Fluid Technology Group

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

197 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

About Website

Visit echterhage.de now to see the best up-to-date Echterhage content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about echterhage.de

With five production companies, Echterhage Holding is one of the world's leading specialists in fluid technology. We develop high-tech components and system solutions for our customers. We are als...

Visit echterhage.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Echterhage.de page load time and found that the first response time was 197 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

echterhage.de performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.7 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,250 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

echterhage.de

197 ms

www.e-holding.de

499 ms

158 ms

jquery.mmenu.all.css

109 ms

layout.min.css,colorbox.min.css,individual.scss,all.scss-b8a0b120.css

212 ms

Our browser made a total of 49 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Echterhage.de, 82% (40 requests) were made to E-holding.de and 16% (8 requests) were made to E-group.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (836 ms) relates to the external source E-group.de.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 111.1 kB (7%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Echterhage.de main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 35.9 kB

  • Original 44.6 kB
  • After minification 43.4 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Echterhage images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 270 B

  • Original 66.5 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 66.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 28.8 kB

  • Original 41.5 kB
  • After minification 12.9 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Echterhage.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (12%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Echterhage. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

echterhage.de accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

echterhage.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

echterhage.de SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Echterhage.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Echterhage.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Echterhage. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: