Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

ecopraxis.co.uk

ecopraxis – Getting to know my local patch by heart

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

669 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ecopraxis content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ecopraxis.co.uk

Visit ecopraxis.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Ecopraxis.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ecopraxis.co.uk performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

91/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

90/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.1 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ecopraxis.co.uk

1141 ms

style.min.css

162 ms

view.min.js

163 ms

wp-polyfill-importmap.min.js

88 ms

P1120430a-scaled.jpg

764 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Ecopraxis.co.uk and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ecopraxis.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.5 kB (3%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Ecopraxis.co.uk main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 50.7 kB

  • Original 63.0 kB
  • After minification 62.7 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 1.7 MB
  • After minification 1.7 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ecopraxis images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 178 B

  • Original 13.4 kB
  • After minification 13.4 kB
  • After compression 13.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 561 B

  • Original 1.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 681 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ecopraxis.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 561 B or 45% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ecopraxis. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

ecopraxis.co.uk accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

ecopraxis.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ecopraxis.co.uk SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ecopraxis.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ecopraxis.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ecopraxis. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: