Report Summary

  • 11

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    24% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

eh.digital

Flow, level, liquid analysis, optical analysis, pressure, temperature measurement, software and system products | Endress+Hauser

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

48 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

726 ms

About Website

Welcome to eh.digital homepage info - get ready to check Eh best content right away, or after learning these important things about eh.digital

People for Process Automation offer you solutions and products in flow, level, liquid analysis, optical analysis, pressure, temperature measurement, software and system products

Visit eh.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Eh.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 48 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

eh.digital performance score

11

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.5 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

15/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.896

3/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.2 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

eh.digital

48 ms

en

1484 ms

components-424f6216.css

23 ms

elements-cd18cb0c.css

34 ms

main-bbc6ee90.css

26 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Eh.digital, 97% (67 requests) were made to Endress.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Tags.tiqcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Endress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 440.9 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Eh.digital main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 415.4 kB

  • Original 450.1 kB
  • After minification 412.5 kB
  • After compression 34.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 415.4 kB or 92% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eh images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 68 B

  • Original 282.5 kB
  • After minification 282.5 kB
  • After compression 282.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 114.7 kB
  • After minification 89.7 kB
  • After compression 89.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eh.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 22% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (39%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

33

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eh. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

eh.digital accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

eh.digital best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

eh.digital SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eh.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eh.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Eh. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: