3.8 sec in total
420 ms
3.2 sec
188 ms
Visit ejc2011.org now to see the best up-to-date Ejc 2011 content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ejc2011.org
※_y_年_m_月_d_日更新【ファクタリングとは】普及が進む新しい金融サービス新たな資金調達手段として注目度が高まっているファクタリングは、売掛債権を換金可能な一連の金融サービスです。英語の「factor」には要因や要素といった意味に加え
Visit ejc2011.orgWe analyzed Ejc2011.org page load time and found that the first response time was 420 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ejc2011.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0.9 s
100/100
25%
Value2.5 s
98/100
10%
Value770 ms
38/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value3.6 s
92/100
10%
420 ms
764 ms
24 ms
21 ms
206 ms
Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ejc2011.org, 63% (27 requests) were made to Ejc2011.de and 12% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) relates to the external source Ejc2011.de.
Page size can be reduced by 68.2 kB (16%)
436.9 kB
368.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ejc2011.org main page is 436.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 337.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 76 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 76 B or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ejc 2011 needs image optimization as it can save up to 58.4 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (52%)
42
20
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ejc 2011. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
ejc2011.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ejc2011.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
ejc2011.org SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
JA
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ejc2011.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ejc2011.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
{{og_description}}
ejc2011.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ejc 2011. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: