Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 52

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 54

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    19% of websites

enneagram.net

Enneagram Explorations with David Fauvre

Page Load Speed

1.7 sec in total

First Response

500 ms

Resources Loaded

819 ms

Page Rendered

336 ms

About Website

Visit enneagram.net now to see the best up-to-date Enneagram content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about enneagram.net

Enneagram Test, Tritype, Instinctual Subtypes Test, Enneagram workshops, Enneagram Coaching, Enneagam forum, Katherine Chernick Fauvre, David W. Fauvre

Visit enneagram.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Enneagram.net page load time and found that the first response time was 500 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

enneagram.net performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,280 ms

18/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.021

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.3 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

enneagram.net

500 ms

129349906.js

33 ms

ee_workshop_250x300.jpg

332 ms

ga.js

6 ms

titlenavbg.jpg

230 ms

Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Enneagram.net, 12% (3 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (500 ms) belongs to the original domain Enneagram.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 487.4 kB (61%)

Content Size

804.7 kB

After Optimization

317.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Enneagram.net main page is 804.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 389.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 38.9 kB

  • Original 47.6 kB
  • After minification 31.4 kB
  • After compression 8.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.2 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 942 B

  • Original 123.2 kB
  • After minification 122.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Enneagram images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 244.9 kB

  • Original 389.7 kB
  • After minification 389.6 kB
  • After compression 144.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.9 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.6 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Enneagram.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (39%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Enneagram. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

enneagram.net accessibility score

52

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

enneagram.net best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

enneagram.net SEO score

54

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Enneagram.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Enneagram.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Enneagram. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: