Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

entsafter-testsieger.net

Entsafter Test 2019 | Die 10 besten Modelle im Entsafter Vergleich

Page Load Speed

12.2 sec in total

First Response

1.7 sec

Resources Loaded

9.8 sec

Page Rendered

660 ms

About Website

Welcome to entsafter-testsieger.net homepage info - get ready to check Entsafter Test Sieger best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about entsafter-testsieger.net

Die besten Modelle im Entsafter Test 2019: Besonders Einsteiger, stehen bei den vielen Modellen, vor der Qual der Wahl – Welcher Entsafter passt zu mir?

Visit entsafter-testsieger.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Entsafter-testsieger.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 10.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

entsafter-testsieger.net performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.6 s

25/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.028

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

entsafter-testsieger.net

1706 ms

font-awesome.min.css

336 ms

jquery-ui.min.css

332 ms

theme.css

444 ms

style.css

339 ms

Our browser made a total of 113 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (111 requests) were addressed to the original Entsafter-testsieger.net, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Entsafter-testsieger.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 92.9 kB (15%)

Content Size

610.2 kB

After Optimization

517.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Entsafter-testsieger.net main page is 610.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 299.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 92.0 kB

  • Original 111.1 kB
  • After minification 110.9 kB
  • After compression 19.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 92.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11 B

  • Original 299.4 kB
  • After minification 299.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Entsafter Test Sieger images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 428 B

  • Original 146.4 kB
  • After minification 146.4 kB
  • After compression 146.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 427 B

  • Original 53.3 kB
  • After minification 53.3 kB
  • After compression 52.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Entsafter-testsieger.net has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (27%)

Requests Now

111

After Optimization

81

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 111 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Entsafter Test Sieger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

entsafter-testsieger.net accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

entsafter-testsieger.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

entsafter-testsieger.net SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    DE

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Entsafter-testsieger.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Entsafter-testsieger.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Entsafter Test Sieger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: