6.5 sec in total
99 ms
4.5 sec
1.8 sec
Click here to check amazing EPAM content for Ukraine. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about epam.ua
Ми - велика команда консультантів, архітекторів, дизайнерів, розробників та інженерів. Ми створюємо інноваційні технології для наших клієнтів. Дізнайтесь про переваги співпраці з нами!
Visit epam.uaWe analyzed Epam.ua page load time and found that the first response time was 99 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
epam.ua performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
26/100
10%
Value18.7 s
0/100
25%
Value10.7 s
7/100
10%
Value2,620 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.637
9/100
15%
Value27.0 s
0/100
10%
99 ms
171 ms
92 ms
77 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Epam.ua, 81% (74 requests) were made to Careers.epam.ua and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Static.hotjar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 183.3 kB (79%)
231.2 kB
47.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Epam.ua main page is 231.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 209.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 183.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 45.4 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 130 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (35%)
86
56
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EPAM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
epam.ua accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
epam.ua best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
epam.ua SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
UK
UK
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Epam.ua can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Ukrainian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Epam.ua main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
{{og_description}}
epam.ua
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of EPAM. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: