Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

er.org

Legal Recruiters | Legal Recruiting Firm | BCG Attorney Search

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

171 ms

Resources Loaded

934 ms

Page Rendered

215 ms

About Website

Welcome to er.org homepage info - get ready to check Er best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about er.org

BCG Attorney Search - voted as the premier legal recruiters in the country. We place attorneys across all types of law firms and practice areas. Call us now at 800-298-6440 to discuss your career.

Visit er.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Er.org page load time and found that the first response time was 171 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

er.org performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

55/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

53/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,840 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.112

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.5 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

er.org

171 ms

www.er.org

248 ms

style.css

135 ms

logo.jpg

319 ms

share_this_icon.jpg

129 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Er.org and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (440 ms) belongs to the original domain Er.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.2 kB (10%)

Content Size

209.1 kB

After Optimization

187.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Er.org main page is 209.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 190.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 8.2 kB

  • Original 10.9 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.2 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 6.8 kB

  • Original 190.1 kB
  • After minification 183.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Er images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 6.2 kB

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 1.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Er.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

15

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Er. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

er.org accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

[role]s are not contained by their required parent element

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

er.org best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

er.org SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Er.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Er.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Er. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: