Access erjames.com. Edward R. James Companies - New Housing Developments In Glenview

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.8 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value650 ms

46/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.111

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.6 s

3/100

10%

erjames.com

86 ms

www.erjames.com

81 ms

www.erjames.com

74 ms

css

37 ms

grid.css

49 ms

Our browser made a total of 136 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (131 requests) were addressed to the original Erjames.com, 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (183 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

3.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Erjames.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

Original 86.7 kB
After minification 84.4 kB
After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 474 B

Original 3.2 MB
After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Er James images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 23.5 kB

Original 198.2 kB
After minification 198.2 kB
After compression 174.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

Original 143.6 kB
After minification 142.6 kB
After compression 118.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Erjames.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 18% of the original size.

Requests Now

128

After Optimization

The browser has sent 128 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Er James. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 65 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.