Access esagegroup.com. Data Integration - Data Analytics Consulting

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.6 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,380 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.204

61/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.9 s

3/100

10%

esagegroup.com

339 ms

esagegroup.com

349 ms

styles.css

66 ms

events-manager.min.css

54 ms

front.css

130 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 56% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Esagegroup.com, 34% (38 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (683 ms) belongs to the original domain Esagegroup.com.

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Esagegroup.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 196.1 kB

Original 234.5 kB
After minification 230.5 kB
After compression 38.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 244.1 kB

Original 2.1 MB
After minification 1.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, ESage Group needs image optimization as it can save up to 244.1 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 97.8 kB

Original 455.2 kB
After minification 450.7 kB
After compression 357.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.8 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 163 B

Original 1.2 kB
After minification 1.2 kB
After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Esagegroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 163 B or 13% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ESage Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.