Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

estheteek.com

Trouve le meilleur institut de beauté à côté de chez toi !

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

982 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Estheteek content for France. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about estheteek.com

Trouvez, notez et recommandez votre esthéticienne préférée, ou au contraire incitez les internautes à ne plus jamais aller dans le salon de beauté qui vous a déçu...

Visit estheteek.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Estheteek.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

estheteek.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

50/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.0 s

14/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,600 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

estheteek.com

183 ms

fr.estheteek.com

355 ms

stub

301 ms

cmp

881 ms

styles.min.css

83 ms

Our browser made a total of 21 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Estheteek.com, 62% (13 requests) were made to Fr.estheteek.com and 14% (3 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (881 ms) relates to the external source Choices.consentframework.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 468.0 kB (54%)

Content Size

873.9 kB

After Optimization

405.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Estheteek.com main page is 873.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 800.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 52.1 kB

  • Original 63.0 kB
  • After minification 46.5 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 16.5 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-52%

Potential reduce by 415.8 kB

  • Original 800.8 kB
  • After minification 800.8 kB
  • After compression 385.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 415.8 kB or 52% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 52 B

  • Original 10.0 kB
  • After minification 10.0 kB
  • After compression 10.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Estheteek.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (39%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Estheteek. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

estheteek.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

estheteek.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

estheteek.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Estheteek.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Estheteek.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Estheteek. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: