Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

etep.com

ETEP - Airborne Recorder & Data acquisition system

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

173 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

58 ms

About Website

Visit etep.com now to see the best up-to-date ETEP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about etep.com

ETEP Design and manufacture Airborne Recorders & Data acquisition systems for aerospace industry and test and measurement activity.

Visit etep.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Etep.com page load time and found that the first response time was 173 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

etep.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.7 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.etep.com

173 ms

minified.js

31 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

893 ms

thunderbolt-commons.a989d465.bundle.min.js

48 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Etep.com, 37% (14 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 32% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (893 ms) relates to the external source Polyfill-fastly.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 407.6 kB (47%)

Content Size

864.6 kB

After Optimization

457.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Etep.com main page is 864.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 514.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 399.4 kB

  • Original 514.4 kB
  • After minification 512.6 kB
  • After compression 115.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 399.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 90.6 kB
  • After minification 86.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. ETEP images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 259.6 kB
  • After minification 259.6 kB
  • After compression 256.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (43%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ETEP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

etep.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

etep.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

etep.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Etep.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Etep.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ETEP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: