Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

exaxe.com

Page Load Speed

6.2 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

4.4 sec

Page Rendered

273 ms

About Website

Visit exaxe.com now to see the best up-to-date Exaxe content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exaxe.com

DELIVERING TOMORROW’S SOLUTIONS TODAY Exaxe is a specialist solution provider that helps life, pensions, and wealth companies launch new products faster, adm

Visit exaxe.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Exaxe.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

exaxe.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value27.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value840 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.096

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.exaxe.com

1559 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

185 ms

styles.css

189 ms

normalize.css

190 ms

style.css

196 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Exaxe.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Exaxe.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 631.0 kB (53%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

570.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Exaxe.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 579.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 60.5 kB

  • Original 73.2 kB
  • After minification 72.0 kB
  • After compression 12.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 45.2 kB

  • Original 394.4 kB
  • After minification 349.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Exaxe needs image optimization as it can save up to 45.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 394.6 kB

  • Original 579.6 kB
  • After minification 572.8 kB
  • After compression 185.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 394.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 130.8 kB

  • Original 153.9 kB
  • After minification 130.1 kB
  • After compression 23.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exaxe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.8 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (56%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exaxe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

exaxe.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

exaxe.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

exaxe.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exaxe.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Exaxe.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exaxe. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: