Access exquision.com. Exquision | Designs with a twist | Selected Art/Designs made by Sarina Meester

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

30/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,880 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.02

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.9 s

0/100

10%

exquision.com

304 ms

core.css

136 ms

quick-styles.css

175 ms

jquery.min.js

42 ms

jquery.easing.js

213 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Exquision.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Exquision.com.

Content Size

2.8 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Exquision.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 112.5 kB

Original 126.1 kB
After minification 118.8 kB
After compression 13.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 111.7 kB

Original 2.5 MB
After minification 2.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exquision images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-54%

Potential reduce by 91.4 kB

Original 169.4 kB
After minification 153.3 kB
After compression 78.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 54% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 39.4 kB

Original 45.8 kB
After minification 33.3 kB
After compression 6.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exquision.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 75 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exquision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.