Access farafood.com. آشپزخانه صنعتی، تجهیزات آشپزخانه صنعتی، فست فود

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value370 ms

71/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.481

18/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.2 s

40/100

10%

farafood.com

429 ms

farafood.com

867 ms

css

35 ms

layout-rtl.css

328 ms

postslider.css

490 ms

Our browser made a total of 161 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (158 requests) were addressed to the original Farafood.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to S.w.org and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Farafood.com.

Content Size

5.9 MB

After Optimization

5.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Farafood.com main page is 5.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 171.5 kB

Original 200.3 kB
After minification 197.0 kB
After compression 28.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.5 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 259.3 kB

Original 5.2 MB
After minification 5.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Farafood images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 23.4 kB

Original 254.1 kB
After minification 254.1 kB
After compression 230.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 25.3 kB

Original 183.1 kB
After minification 182.9 kB
After compression 157.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Farafood.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 25.3 kB or 14% of the original size.

Requests Now

156

After Optimization

The browser has sent 156 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Farafood. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 63 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.