Access filtrete.com. Filtrete™ Home Filtration Products

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.8 s

16/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,510 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.209

60/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value35.8 s

0/100

10%

filtrete.com

31 ms

filtrete.com

58 ms

www.filtrete.com

68 ms

624 ms

phoenix.css

20 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 77% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Filtrete.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Dpm.demdex.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (624 ms) belongs to the original domain Filtrete.com.

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Filtrete.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 95.9 kB

Original 113.0 kB
After minification 92.6 kB
After compression 17.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.3 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 95.9 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 125 B

Original 979.3 kB
After minification 979.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Filtrete images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 975.5 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB
After compression 488.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 975.5 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 341.1 kB

Original 573.0 kB
After minification 567.0 kB
After compression 231.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filtrete.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 341.1 kB or 60% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Filtrete. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.