Access finkurve.com. Arvog

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,820 ms

9/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.72

6/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.0 s

6/100

10%

finkurve.com

62 ms

arvog.com

993 ms

tailwindcss.js

970 ms

index.js

725 ms

split-type.js

742 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Finkurve.com, 72% (38 requests) were made to Arvog.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Arvog.com.

Content Size

4.1 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Finkurve.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 20.4 kB

Original 24.6 kB
After minification 17.8 kB
After compression 4.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.8 kB, which is 27% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 20.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 499.1 kB

Original 3.7 MB
After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Finkurve needs image optimization as it can save up to 499.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.7 kB

Original 331.0 kB
After minification 331.0 kB
After compression 328.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 689 B

Original 69.4 kB
After minification 69.4 kB
After compression 68.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Finkurve.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Finkurve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.