Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 74

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 40% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

firewater.net

Digital Marketing, Presence and PR Specialists | Firewater

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

36 ms

Resources Loaded

4.2 sec

Page Rendered

543 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Firewater content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about firewater.net

Firewater is a team of specialists with a focus on digital presence and PR. We believe that for a business to be relevant now and the future, they have to invest in a digital and PR presence.

Visit firewater.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Firewater.net page load time and found that the first response time was 36 ms and then it took 4.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

firewater.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.2 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,230 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value27.2 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

firewater.net

36 ms

firewater.net

449 ms

www.firewater.net

560 ms

gtm.js

98 ms

css

63 ms

Our browser made a total of 186 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Firewater.net, 6% (11 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com and 4% (8 requests) were made to Embed.tawk.to. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Firewater.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (29%)

Content Size

5.8 MB

After Optimization

4.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Firewater.net main page is 5.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 62.0 kB
  • After compression 14.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.4 kB, which is 23% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.2 MB

  • Original 4.5 MB
  • After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Firewater needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.2 MB or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 319.9 kB

  • Original 972.6 kB
  • After minification 969.9 kB
  • After compression 652.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 319.9 kB or 33% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 134.0 kB

  • Original 219.6 kB
  • After minification 201.3 kB
  • After compression 85.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Firewater.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 134.0 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 76 (46%)

Requests Now

167

After Optimization

91

The browser has sent 167 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Firewater. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 49 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

firewater.net accessibility score

74

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

firewater.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

firewater.net SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Firewater.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Firewater.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Firewater. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: