Report Summary

  • 66

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    79% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

fitacola.com

Fitacola Collage

Page Load Speed

17.8 sec in total

First Response

6.7 sec

Resources Loaded

10.6 sec

Page Rendered

471 ms

About Website

Visit fitacola.com now to see the best up-to-date Fitacola content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fitacola.com

Carlos Quitério and Graça Santos make paper collage art, mixing assembling, cutting and pasting old and new references from all kinds of images and paper scraps, applied into many means and ends.

Visit fitacola.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fitacola.com page load time and found that the first response time was 6.7 sec and then it took 11.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fitacola.com performance score

66

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

51/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fitacola.com

6672 ms

webfont.js

20 ms

form-theme-dark.min.css

145 ms

dark.css

238 ms

style.css

242 ms

Our browser made a total of 126 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Fitacola.com, 13% (17 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com and 6% (8 requests) were made to O.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Fitacola.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 505.9 kB (18%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Fitacola.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 49.7 kB

  • Original 61.2 kB
  • After minification 60.9 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 62.1 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fitacola images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 205.9 kB

  • Original 305.3 kB
  • After minification 260.6 kB
  • After compression 99.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.9 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 188.2 kB

  • Original 212.1 kB
  • After minification 160.5 kB
  • After compression 23.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fitacola.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 188.2 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (30%)

Requests Now

121

After Optimization

85

The browser has sent 121 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fitacola. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fitacola.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

fitacola.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fitacola.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    LA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fitacola.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Latin language. Our system also found out that Fitacola.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fitacola. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: