Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

flightcompensation.com

Flight Delay Compensation | UK EU261 Compensation For Delayed Flights | No Win No Fee

Page Load Speed

4.5 sec in total

First Response

317 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

About Website

Welcome to flightcompensation.com homepage info - get ready to check Flight Compensation best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about flightcompensation.com

Claim With The UK's No 1 - Over £74m Claimed. Industry Leading Success Rates. SRA Regulated. Update 2021 Regulations. Get An Instant Online Decision.

Visit flightcompensation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Flightcompensation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 317 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flightcompensation.com performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.5 s

39/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value740 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.006

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flightcompensation.com

317 ms

flight-delay-compensation

1875 ms

plugin.css

152 ms

cookieblocker.min.css

230 ms

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

306 ms

Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Flightcompensation.com, 79% (22 requests) were made to Bottonline.co.uk and 14% (4 requests) were made to Cdn.yoshki.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Bottonline.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 219.2 kB (65%)

Content Size

339.5 kB

After Optimization

120.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Flightcompensation.com main page is 339.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 266.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 212.0 kB

  • Original 266.2 kB
  • After minification 257.2 kB
  • After compression 54.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 212.0 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 7.2 kB

  • Original 35.9 kB
  • After minification 28.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flight Compensation needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.2 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 38 B

  • Original 37.2 kB
  • After minification 37.2 kB
  • After compression 37.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 19 B

  • Original 97 B
  • After minification 83 B
  • After compression 78 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightcompensation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 19 B or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (45%)

Requests Now

20

After Optimization

11

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flight Compensation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

flightcompensation.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

flightcompensation.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

flightcompensation.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightcompensation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flightcompensation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Flight Compensation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: