Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

flugger.no

Maling til hjemmet, både innendørsmaling og utendørsmaling

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

340 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

About Website

Welcome to flugger.no homepage info - get ready to check Flugger best content for Norway right away, or after learning these important things about flugger.no

Maling til hjemmet, både innendørsmaling og utendørsmaling. Enten du skal kjøpe maling, sparkel eller malerulle har vi det du trenger.

Visit flugger.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Flugger.no page load time and found that the first response time was 340 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

flugger.no performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.0 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.2 s

20/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,270 ms

6/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.082

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

29/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

flugger.no

340 ms

www.flugger.no

808 ms

uc.js

135 ms

17983.js

386 ms

css2

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 42 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Flugger.no, 45% (19 requests) were made to Assets.flugger.dk and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Assets.flugger.dk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 414.1 kB (85%)

Content Size

487.7 kB

After Optimization

73.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Flugger.no main page is 487.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 475.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 414.1 kB

  • Original 475.1 kB
  • After minification 468.5 kB
  • After compression 61.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 414.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 12 B

  • Original 12.6 kB
  • After minification 12.6 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (41%)

Requests Now

37

After Optimization

22

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flugger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

flugger.no accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

flugger.no best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

flugger.no SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flugger.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flugger.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Flugger. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: