Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

fluiddrivemedia.com

Fluid Drive Media

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

96 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

589 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Fluid Drive Media content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fluiddrivemedia.com

Let AI recession-proof your home services business, help you reach more customers and close more jobs.

Visit fluiddrivemedia.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Fluiddrivemedia.com page load time and found that the first response time was 96 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fluiddrivemedia.com performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

40/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.6 s

82/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fluiddrivemedia.com

96 ms

fluiddrivemedia.com

223 ms

regular.css

67 ms

solid.css

78 ms

brands.css

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Fluiddrivemedia.com, 73% (24 requests) were made to Images.leadconnectorhq.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Images.leadconnectorhq.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 475.4 kB (84%)

Content Size

564.3 kB

After Optimization

88.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Fluiddrivemedia.com main page is 564.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 540.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 466.6 kB

  • Original 540.1 kB
  • After minification 485.9 kB
  • After compression 73.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 466.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 6.7 kB

  • Original 21.2 kB
  • After minification 14.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fluid Drive Media needs image optimization as it can save up to 6.7 kB or 32% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 2.0 kB

  • Original 2.9 kB
  • After minification 931 B
  • After compression 885 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fluiddrivemedia.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)

Requests Now

31

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fluid Drive Media. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

fluiddrivemedia.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

fluiddrivemedia.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

fluiddrivemedia.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fluiddrivemedia.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fluiddrivemedia.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fluid Drive Media. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: