Report Summary

  • 90

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 78% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

foersom.org

Foersom Org

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

218 ms

Resources Loaded

922 ms

Page Rendered

88 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Foersom content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about foersom.org

Foersom Org, Europe à go-go

Visit foersom.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Foersom.org page load time and found that the first response time was 218 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foersom.org performance score

90

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

76/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

72/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foersom.org

218 ms

216 ms

style.css

98 ms

counter.js

29 ms

t.php

108 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Foersom.org, 77% (10 requests) were made to Foersom.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Statcounter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (383 ms) relates to the external source Foersom.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 22.8 kB (21%)

Content Size

109.5 kB

After Optimization

86.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Foersom.org main page is 109.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 94.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.9 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 1.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 44% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 94.3 kB
  • After minification 83.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Foersom needs image optimization as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 9.3 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 1.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foersom.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.6 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

11

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foersom. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

foersom.org accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

foersom.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

foersom.org SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foersom.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foersom.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foersom. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: