Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 92

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    92% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

foodchomp.de

foodchomp.de

Page Load Speed

5.8 sec in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

5.3 sec

Page Rendered

352 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Foodchomp content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about foodchomp.de

This domain may be for sale!

Visit foodchomp.de

Key Findings

We analyzed Foodchomp.de page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

foodchomp.de performance score

92

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

90/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.9 s

96/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

foodchomp.de

239 ms

www.foodchomp.de

292 ms

1682892581.js

37 ms

system.base.css

129 ms

system.menus.css

227 ms

Our browser made a total of 222 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (93 requests) were addressed to the original Foodchomp.de, 5% (10 requests) were made to S0.2mdn.net and 4% (9 requests) were made to Fileserver.mode.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) relates to the external source Rt.legolas-media.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (29%)

Content Size

3.6 MB

After Optimization

2.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Foodchomp.de main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 127.7 kB

  • Original 169.9 kB
  • After minification 166.5 kB
  • After compression 42.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 168.0 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foodchomp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 669.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 972.8 kB
  • After compression 386.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 669.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 91.4 kB

  • Original 109.7 kB
  • After minification 65.4 kB
  • After compression 18.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foodchomp.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 127 (63%)

Requests Now

203

After Optimization

76

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 203 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foodchomp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 41 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

foodchomp.de accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

foodchomp.de best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

foodchomp.de SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foodchomp.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Foodchomp.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foodchomp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: