Access fosgrafe.com. Fós Grafê | Fotografia além da imagem!

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

55/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value630 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.393

26/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.7 s

22/100

10%

www.fosgrafe.com

3624 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

288 ms

551 ms

css

24 ms

css

36 ms

Our browser made a total of 141 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Fosgrafe.com, 11% (16 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (16 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Fosgrafe.com.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

677.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Fosgrafe.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 471.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 109.7 kB

Original 138.2 kB
After minification 120.7 kB
After compression 28.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.5 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

Original 471.0 kB
After minification 443.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fosgrafe images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 215.4 kB

Original 377.8 kB
After minification 374.4 kB
After compression 162.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 212.2 kB

Original 256.1 kB
After minification 254.1 kB
After compression 43.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fosgrafe.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 212.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

120

After Optimization

The browser has sent 120 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fosgrafe. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 35 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.