Access fotovision.com.mt. fotovision - Photographic Equipment & Accessories

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

2/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value23.5 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value350 ms

73/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.2 s

12/100

10%

fotovision.com.mt

415 ms

fotovision.com.mt

3231 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

166 ms

style.min.css

350 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

279 ms

Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Fotovision.com.mt, 53% (49 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Fotovision.com.mt.

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

502.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Fotovision.com.mt main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 798.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 68.7 kB

Original 85.1 kB
After minification 83.6 kB
After compression 16.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

Original 159.8 kB
After minification 141.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fotovision needs image optimization as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 543.1 kB

Original 798.9 kB
After minification 798.8 kB
After compression 255.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 543.1 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 561.2 kB

Original 650.0 kB
After minification 639.4 kB
After compression 88.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fotovision.com.mt needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 561.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fotovision. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.