807 ms in total
101 ms
534 ms
172 ms
Welcome to foxmarks.com homepage info - get ready to check Fo Xmarks best content right away, or after learning these important things about foxmarks.com
Offers bookmark synchronization, search enhancement and web discovery based on sites bookmarked by users.
Visit foxmarks.comWe analyzed Foxmarks.com page load time and found that the first response time was 101 ms and then it took 706 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.
foxmarks.com performance score
101 ms
33 ms
31 ms
11 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Foxmarks.com, 48% (14 requests) were made to Static.xmarks.com and 21% (6 requests) were made to Xmarks.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (283 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 174.6 kB (39%)
449.7 kB
275.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Foxmarks.com main page is 449.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 212.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fo Xmarks images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 107.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 107.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 42.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foxmarks.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 42.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
26
26
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fo Xmarks. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
{{url}}
{{time}} ms
foxmarks.com SEO score
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxmarks.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Foxmarks.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
{{og_description}}
foxmarks.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fo Xmarks. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: