Access futurefordofconcord.com. Future Ford of Concord

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value27.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,250 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.145

77/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value33.2 s

0/100

10%

futurefordofconcord.com

142 ms

www.futurefordofconcord.com

411 ms

style.min.css

134 ms

classic-themes.min.css

182 ms

m2en-stage.css

192 ms

Our browser made a total of 140 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 71% of them (99 requests) were addressed to the original Futurefordofconcord.com, 6% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.jazelc.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to Images.jazelc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (19.6 sec) relates to the external source Ford.com.

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Futurefordofconcord.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 834.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 735.3 kB

Original 834.9 kB
After minification 741.3 kB
After compression 99.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 93.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 735.3 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 570 B

Original 2.2 kB
After minification 1.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Future Ford Of Concord needs image optimization as it can save up to 570 B or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 10.1 kB

Original 688.2 kB
After minification 688.2 kB
After compression 678.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 5.6 kB

Original 238.8 kB
After minification 238.6 kB
After compression 233.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurefordofconcord.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

119

After Optimization

The browser has sent 119 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Ford Of Concord. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 76 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 42 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.