Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 58% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

gipzal.com

Gipzal.com

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

413 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

141 ms

About Website

Welcome to gipzal.com homepage info - get ready to check Gipzal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about gipzal.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit gipzal.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gipzal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 413 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gipzal.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.7 s

51/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value550 ms

54/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.246

50/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ww38.gipzal.com

413 ms

caf.js

22 ms

style.css

4 ms

style.css

4 ms

sale_form.js

285 ms

Our browser made a total of 12 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Gipzal.com, 17% (2 requests) were made to Afs.googlesyndication.com and 17% (2 requests) were made to Afs.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (413 ms) relates to the external source Ww38.gipzal.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 18.7 kB (20%)

Content Size

93.9 kB

After Optimization

75.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gipzal.com main page is 93.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 63.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 12.2 kB

  • Original 18.0 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB
  • After compression 5.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 239 B

  • Original 11.4 kB
  • After minification 11.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gipzal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

  • Original 63.6 kB
  • After minification 61.3 kB
  • After compression 57.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 152 B

  • Original 882 B
  • After minification 882 B
  • After compression 730 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gipzal.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 152 B or 17% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)

Requests Now

11

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gipzal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

gipzal.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

gipzal.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

gipzal.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gipzal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Gipzal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gipzal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: