Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 5

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    21% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

giraffen.com

Shopping & Köpcenter i Kalmar | Kvarteret Giraffen

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

281 ms

Resources Loaded

6 sec

Page Rendered

638 ms

About Website

Visit giraffen.com now to see the best up-to-date Giraffen content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about giraffen.com

Visit giraffen.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Giraffen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giraffen.com performance score

5

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.8 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,610 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.788

5/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.5 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giraffen.com

281 ms

giraffen.com

3899 ms

uc.js

196 ms

ivory-ajax-search.min.css

232 ms

sbi-styles.min.css

571 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Giraffen.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Accessibility-widget.handiscover.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Consent.cookiebot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Giraffen.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (65%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

830.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Giraffen.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 220.3 kB

  • Original 259.3 kB
  • After minification 255.3 kB
  • After compression 39.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 220.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 440.2 kB
  • After minification 416.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Giraffen images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 871.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB
  • After compression 312.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 871.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 447.6 kB

  • Original 510.5 kB
  • After minification 493.5 kB
  • After compression 62.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Giraffen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 447.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (69%)

Requests Now

55

After Optimization

17

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giraffen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

giraffen.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

giraffen.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

giraffen.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    SV

  • Language Claimed

    SV

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giraffen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Swedish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Giraffen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giraffen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: