Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

gittspring.com

Count on Our Expertise for Suspension Repair in Auburn, WA

Page Load Speed

423 ms in total

First Response

34 ms

Resources Loaded

293 ms

Page Rendered

96 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gittspring content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gittspring.com

At Gitt's Spring Company, we specialize in all kinds of suspension services. Call or visit us today for suspension repairs in Auburn, WA. We can help you!

Visit gittspring.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gittspring.com page load time and found that the first response time was 34 ms and then it took 389 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gittspring.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.2 s

60/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.184

66/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.7 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gittspring.com

34 ms

gittspring.com

211 ms

base.css

11 ms

error.css

14 ms

base.css

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Gittspring.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (211 ms) belongs to the original domain Gittspring.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.2 kB (2%)

Content Size

109.7 kB

After Optimization

107.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Gittspring.com main page is 109.7 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 104.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-55%

Potential reduce by 822 B

  • Original 1.5 kB
  • After minification 1.4 kB
  • After compression 671 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 822 B or 55% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 30 B

  • Original 104.9 kB
  • After minification 104.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gittspring images are well optimized though.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 3.2 kB
  • After minification 3.2 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gittspring.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (50%)

Requests Now

6

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 6 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gittspring. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

gittspring.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

gittspring.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

gittspring.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gittspring.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gittspring.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gittspring. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: