Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 45% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

gizeleclinic.com

Page Load Speed

636 ms in total

First Response

256 ms

Resources Loaded

309 ms

Page Rendered

71 ms

About Website

Welcome to gizeleclinic.com homepage info - get ready to check Gizeleclinic best content right away, or after learning these important things about gizeleclinic.com

TOTOSAJA adalah situs toto saja slot mudah menang terbaik no.1.

Visit gizeleclinic.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gizeleclinic.com page load time and found that the first response time was 256 ms and then it took 380 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gizeleclinic.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gizeleclinic.com

256 ms

v0.js

27 ms

css2

38 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyD9A99d.ttf

24 ms

o-0mIpQlx3QUlC5A4PNB6Ryti20_6n1iPHjcz6L1SoM-jCpoiyAaBN9d.ttf

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 5 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 20% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gizeleclinic.com, 40% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 20% (1 request) were made to Cdn.ampproject.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (256 ms) belongs to the original domain Gizeleclinic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 19.0 kB (17%)

Content Size

108.6 kB

After Optimization

89.6 kB

  • HTML
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Gizeleclinic.com main page is 108.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 86.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 19.0 kB

  • Original 22.6 kB
  • After minification 20.9 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 86.0 kB
  • After minification 86.0 kB
  • After compression 86.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

2

After Optimization

2

  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 2 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gizeleclinic. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

gizeleclinic.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gizeleclinic.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gizeleclinic.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ID

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gizeleclinic.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is . Our system also found out that Gizeleclinic.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gizeleclinic. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: