Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 30

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    50% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 29% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

glooke.com

Glooke: Ciò che ti serve dove ti serve ! Come a casa tua!

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

401 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

776 ms

About Website

Visit glooke.com now to see the best up-to-date Glooke content for Italy and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about glooke.com

Scopri un'ampia selezione di prodotti per la casa, cosmetici e molto altro, dai migliori fornitori italiani. Solo su Glooke, l'e-commerce che non ti aspetti!

Visit glooke.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glooke.com page load time and found that the first response time was 401 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glooke.com performance score

30

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.3 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.5 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value730 ms

40/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.022

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.0 s

8/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glooke.com

401 ms

www.glooke.com

1024 ms

gtm.js

132 ms

bootstrap.min.css

196 ms

font-awesome.min.css

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 179 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Glooke.com, 75% (134 requests) were made to Cdn.storeden.net and 6% (10 requests) were made to Egress.storeden.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.storeden.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.2 MB (14%)

Content Size

23.8 MB

After Optimization

20.6 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glooke.com main page is 23.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 23.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 253.5 kB

  • Original 292.7 kB
  • After minification 253.1 kB
  • After compression 39.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 39.6 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 253.5 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 3.0 MB

  • Original 23.3 MB
  • After minification 20.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Glooke needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.0 MB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 10.3 kB

  • Original 140.0 kB
  • After minification 140.0 kB
  • After compression 129.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 926 B

  • Original 26.5 kB
  • After minification 26.5 kB
  • After compression 25.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glooke.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (17%)

Requests Now

172

After Optimization

143

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 172 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glooke. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

glooke.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Best Practices

glooke.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

glooke.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glooke.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glooke.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glooke. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: