Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 34% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

glorypaper.com

广东辉煌环保科技有限公司,www.glorypaper.com

Page Load Speed

23.7 sec in total

First Response

2.4 sec

Resources Loaded

20.2 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

About Website

Welcome to glorypaper.com homepage info - get ready to check Glorypaper best content right away, or after learning these important things about glorypaper.com

广东辉煌环保科技有限公司,www.glorypaper.com,经营范围包括环保产品的技术研发、设计、咨询、服务；生产、加工、销售：纸（年产量5000吨以下造纸厂除外）、纸制品、环保产品；印刷品印刷（不含出版物印刷）。

Visit glorypaper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Glorypaper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.4 sec and then it took 21.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glorypaper.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value45.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value28.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value660 ms

45/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.67

0/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glorypaper.com

2353 ms

style.css

951 ms

jquery-1.11.3.min.js

1253 ms

bootstrap.min.js

670 ms

page.js

680 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Glorypaper.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to Api.map.baidu.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Miao.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (16.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Glorypaper.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 175.7 kB (7%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Glorypaper.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

  • Original 53.8 kB
  • After minification 48.8 kB
  • After compression 10.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 53.6 kB

  • Original 2.3 MB
  • After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glorypaper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-21%

Potential reduce by 34.9 kB

  • Original 170.1 kB
  • After minification 170.0 kB
  • After compression 135.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 34.9 kB or 21% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-46%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

  • Original 94.6 kB
  • After minification 94.5 kB
  • After compression 50.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glorypaper.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 46% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (28%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

48

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glorypaper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

glorypaper.com accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

glorypaper.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

glorypaper.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glorypaper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Glorypaper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glorypaper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: